The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Preliminary Clinical Study of the Differences Between Interobserver Evaluation and Deep Convolutional Neural Network-Based Segmentation of Multiple Organs at Risk in CT Images of Lung Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, July 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00627 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Jinhan Zhu, Yimei Liu, Jun Zhang, Yixuan Wang, Lixin Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 14% |
Computer Science | 3 | 11% |
Engineering | 3 | 11% |
Physics and Astronomy | 2 | 7% |
Sports and Recreations | 1 | 4% |
Other | 2 | 7% |
Unknown | 13 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2019.
All research outputs
#23,485,937
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,353
of 22,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#314,818
of 364,863 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#195
of 293 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,863 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 293 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.