↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of GenesWell BCT Score With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Risk Classification in Asian Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets

Readers on

mendeley
15 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of GenesWell BCT Score With Oncotype DX Recurrence Score for Risk Classification in Asian Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive, HER2-Negative Early Breast Cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, July 2019
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.00667
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mi Jeong Kwon, Jeong Eon Lee, Joon Jeong, Sang Uk Woo, Jinil Han, Byeong-il Kang, Jee-Eun Kim, Youngho Moon, Sae Byul Lee, Seonghoon Lee, Yoon-La Choi, Youngmi Kwon, Kyoung Song, Gyungyub Gong, Young Kee Shin

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 15 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 15 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 27%
Other 4 27%
Student > Bachelor 4 27%
Professor 1 7%
Unknown 2 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 7%
Other 2 13%
Unknown 3 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2019.
All research outputs
#684,234
of 26,725,470 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#112
of 23,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,606
of 362,523 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#6
of 302 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,725,470 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,561 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 362,523 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 302 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.