The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Comparison of Peri-operative and Early Oncological Outcomes of Robot-Assisted vs. Open Salvage Lymph Node Dissection in Recurrent Prostate Cancer
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00781 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gaëtan Devos, Tim Muilwijk, Yannic Raskin, Victor Calderon, Lisa Moris, Thomas Van den Broeck, Charlien Berghen, Gert De Meerleer, Maarten Albersen, Hendrik Van Poppel, Wouter Everaerts, Steven Joniau |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Belgium | 2 | 40% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 6 | 22% |
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 2 | 7% |
Other | 1 | 4% |
Other | 5 | 19% |
Unknown | 7 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 41% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
Psychology | 1 | 4% |
Linguistics | 1 | 4% |
Unknown | 13 | 48% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 September 2019.
All research outputs
#8,916,666
of 26,383,299 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,545
of 23,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#142,531
of 353,866 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#96
of 391 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,383,299 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 65th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,024 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,866 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 391 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.