↓ Skip to main content

Best Practice in Systemic Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Best Practice in Systemic Therapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2019
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.00815
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sjoukje F. Oosting, Robert I. Haddad

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 79 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 13%
Researcher 7 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 8%
Student > Master 6 8%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 28 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 13 16%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Other 7 9%
Unknown 32 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2019.
All research outputs
#23,888,153
of 26,589,077 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,905
of 23,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,105
of 353,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#270
of 357 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,589,077 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,335 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 357 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.