↓ Skip to main content

Standardization of Sequencing Coverage Depth in NGS: Recommendation for Detection of Clonal and Subclonal Mutations in Cancer Diagnostics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
93 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
229 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Standardization of Sequencing Coverage Depth in NGS: Recommendation for Detection of Clonal and Subclonal Mutations in Cancer Diagnostics
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, September 2019
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2019.00851
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anna Petrackova, Michal Vasinek, Lenka Sedlarikova, Tereza Dyskova, Petra Schneiderova, Tomas Novosad, Tomas Papajik, Eva Kriegova

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 229 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 229 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 13%
Student > Master 27 12%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 5%
Other 23 10%
Unknown 80 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 75 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 21 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Engineering 8 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 3%
Other 18 8%
Unknown 86 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 January 2023.
All research outputs
#7,209,370
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,461
of 22,432 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,867
of 350,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#65
of 390 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,432 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 350,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 390 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.