You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
LEAM vs. BEAM vs. CLV Conditioning Regimen for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation in Malignant Lymphomas. Retrospective Comparison of Toxicity and Efficacy on 222 Patients in the First 100 Days After Transplant, On Behalf of the Romanian Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00892 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrei Colita, Anca Colita, Horia Bumbea, Adina Croitoru, Carmen Orban, Lavinia Eugenia Lipan, Oana-Gabriela Craciun, Dan Soare, Cecilia Ghimici, Raluca Manolache, Ionel Gelatu, Ana-Maria Vladareanu, Sergiu Pasca, Patric Teodorescu, Delia Dima, Anca Lupu, Daniel Coriu, Ciprian Tomuleasa, Alina Tanase |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Turkey | 1 | 20% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 54 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 12 | 22% |
| Unknown | 13 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 39% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 15 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 September 2019.
All research outputs
#16,274,398
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,182
of 22,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,875
of 354,410 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#132
of 411 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 354,410 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 411 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.