The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision Making in Patients With Metastatic Spine. The Role of Minimally Invasive Treatment Modalities
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.00915 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alfredo Conti, Güliz Acker, Anne Kluge, Franziska Loebel, Anita Kreimeier, Volker Budach, Peter Vajkoczy, Ilaria Ghetti, Antonino F. Germano', Carolin Senger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Germany | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 29% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 110 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 10% |
| Other | 10 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 8% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 33 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 33% |
| Neuroscience | 8 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 4% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 14 | 13% |
| Unknown | 40 | 36% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,553,995
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,626
of 22,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,065
of 357,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#69
of 403 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 403 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.