The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Laparoscopic vs. Open Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Single-Institution, Propensity Score Matching Study in China
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, October 2019
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.01107 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Zhen Yuan, Dongyan Cao, Jie Yang, Mei Yu, Keng Shen, Jiaxin Yang, Ying Zhang, Huimei Zhou |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 18% |
Other | 3 | 14% |
Researcher | 3 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 2 | 9% |
Student > Master | 2 | 9% |
Other | 4 | 18% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 55% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 9% |
Mathematics | 1 | 5% |
Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 5% |
Other | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 4 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#17,554,426
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,011
of 22,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#240,671
of 378,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#206
of 497 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 378,728 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 497 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.