The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Non-invasive Radiomic Method Using 18F-FDG PET Predicts Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Genotype and Prognosis in Patients With Glioma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, November 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2019.01183 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Longfei Li, Wei Mu, Yaning Wang, Zhenyu Liu, Zehua Liu, Yu Wang, Wenbin Ma, Ziren Kong, Shuo Wang, Xuezhi Zhou, Wei Wei, Xin Cheng, Yusong Lin, Jie Tian |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 38 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 4 | 11% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 7 | 18% |
| Unknown | 12 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 15 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2019.
All research outputs
#23,154,082
of 25,806,080 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,265
of 22,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,012
of 376,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#319
of 465 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,806,080 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,805 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,546 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 465 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.