↓ Skip to main content

Methods of Skull Base Repair Following Endoscopic Endonasal Tumor Resection: A Review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
55 Mendeley
Title
Methods of Skull Base Repair Following Endoscopic Endonasal Tumor Resection: A Review
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2020
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2020.01614
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cathal John Hannan, Eoin Kelleher, Mohsen Javadpour

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 55 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 8 15%
Researcher 6 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 5%
Other 3 5%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 24 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 40%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Unknown 27 49%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 September 2020.
All research outputs
#15,751,285
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,974
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#236,617
of 426,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#166
of 574 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 426,314 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 574 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.