↓ Skip to main content

A Deep Learning Approach Validates Genetic Risk Factors for Late Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy in a REQUITE Multi-National Cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, October 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Deep Learning Approach Validates Genetic Risk Factors for Late Toxicity After Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy in a REQUITE Multi-National Cohort
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, October 2020
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2020.541281
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michela Carlotta Massi, Francesca Gasperoni, Francesca Ieva, Anna Maria Paganoni, Paolo Zunino, Andrea Manzoni, Nicola Rares Franco, Liv Veldeman, Piet Ost, Valérie Fonteyne, Christopher J. Talbot, Tim Rattay, Adam Webb, Paul R. Symonds, Kerstie Johnson, Maarten Lambrecht, Karin Haustermans, Gert De Meerleer, Dirk de Ruysscher, Ben Vanneste, Evert Van Limbergen, Ananya Choudhury, Rebecca M. Elliott, Elena Sperk, Carsten Herskind, Marlon R. Veldwijk, Barbara Avuzzi, Tommaso Giandini, Riccardo Valdagni, Alessandro Cicchetti, David Azria, Marie-Pierre Farcy Jacquet, Barry S. Rosenstein, Richard G. Stock, Kayla Collado, Ana Vega, Miguel Elías Aguado-Barrera, Patricia Calvo, Alison M. Dunning, Laura Fachal, Sarah L. Kerns, Debbie Payne, Jenny Chang-Claude, Petra Seibold, Catharine M. L. West, Tiziana Rancati

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 15%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Master 4 12%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 12 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 18%
Computer Science 4 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 16 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2020.
All research outputs
#16,588,485
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,841
of 22,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,593
of 439,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#185
of 682 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,911 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 682 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.