↓ Skip to main content

A Targeted Gene Panel for Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing in Neuroblastoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, December 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A Targeted Gene Panel for Circulating Tumor DNA Sequencing in Neuroblastoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, December 2020
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2020.596191
Pubmed ID
Authors

Flora Cimmino, Vito Alessandro Lasorsa, Simona Vetrella, Achille Iolascon, Mario Capasso

Abstract

Liquid biopsies do not reflect the complete mutation profile of the tumor but have the potential to identify actionable mutations when tumor biopsies are not available as well as variants with low allele frequency. Most retrospective studies conducted in small cohorts of pediatric cancers have illustrated that the technology yield substantial potential in neuroblastoma. The molecular landscape of neuroblastoma harbors potentially actionable genomic alterations. We aimed to study the utility of liquid biopsy to characterize the mutational landscape of primary neuroblastoma using a custom gene panel for ctDNA targeted sequencing. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) was performed on ctDNA of 11 patients with primary neuroblastoma stage 4. To avoid the detection of false variants, we used UMIs (unique molecular identifiers) for the library construction, increased the sequencing depth and developed ad hoc bioinformatic analyses including the hard filtering of the variant calls. We identified 9/11 (81.8%) patients who carry at least one pathogenic variation. The most frequently mutated genes were KMT2C (five cases), NOTCH1/2 (four cases), CREBBP (three cases), ARID1A/B (three cases), ALK (two cases), FGFR1 (two cases), FAT4 (two cases) and CARD11 (two cases). We developed a targeted NGS approach to identify tumor-specific alterations in ctDNA of neuroblastoma patients. Our results show the reliability of our approach to generate genomic information which can be integrated with clinical and pathological data at diagnosis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 19%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 15 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 3%
Engineering 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 17 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#16,733,516
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,619
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#307,562
of 517,526 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#171
of 627 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,526 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 627 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.