You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Comparison of Manual and Semi-Automatic [18F]PSMA-1007 PET Based Contouring Techniques for Intraprostatic Tumor Delineation in Patients With Primary Prostate Cancer and Validation With Histopathology as Standard of Reference
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, December 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2020.600690 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Simon K. B. Spohn, Maria Kramer, Selina Kiefer, Peter Bronsert, August Sigle, Wolfgang Schultze-Seemann, Cordula A. Jilg, Tanja Sprave, Lara Ceci, Thomas F. Fassbender, Nils H. Nicolay, Juri Ruf, Anca L. Grosu, Constantinos Zamboglou |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 18 | 60% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 19 | 63% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#22,986,241
of 25,628,260 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,210
of 22,751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#453,732
of 524,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#397
of 657 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,628,260 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,751 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 524,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 657 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.