↓ Skip to main content

To Become or Not to Become Tumorigenic: Subventricular Zone Versus Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2020
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
52 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
To Become or Not to Become Tumorigenic: Subventricular Zone Versus Hippocampal Neural Stem Cells
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2020
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2020.602217
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ángela Fontán-Lozano, Sara Morcuende, Mª América Davis-López de Carrizosa, Beatriz Benítez-Temiño, Rebeca Mejías, Esperanza R Matarredona

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 52 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 52 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 3 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 22 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 15%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 12%
Neuroscience 4 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Chemistry 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 22 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2021.
All research outputs
#17,882,207
of 26,181,776 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,282
of 22,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#336,047
of 533,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#234
of 680 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,181,776 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,924 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 533,335 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 680 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.