↓ Skip to main content

AI and High-Grade Glioma for Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: Do All Machine Learning Models Perform Equally Well?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
AI and High-Grade Glioma for Diagnosis and Outcome Prediction: Do All Machine Learning Models Perform Equally Well?
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.601425
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luca Pasquini, Antonio Napolitano, Martina Lucignani, Emanuela Tagliente, Francesco Dellepiane, Maria Camilla Rossi-Espagnet, Matteo Ritrovato, Antonello Vidiri, Veronica Villani, Giulio Ranazzi, Antonella Stoppacciaro, Andrea Romano, Alberto Di Napoli, Alessandro Bozzao

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 11%
Researcher 3 8%
Lecturer 2 5%
Unspecified 2 5%
Student > Master 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 24 65%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Unspecified 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Engineering 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 23 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 December 2021.
All research outputs
#16,724,670
of 26,338,415 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,935
of 22,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#278,555
of 530,170 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#307
of 1,348 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,338,415 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,976 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 530,170 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,348 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.