The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Analysis of Gut Microbiome Using Explainable Machine Learning Predicts Risk of Diarrhea Associated With Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Neratinib: A Pilot Study
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.604584 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Chi Wah Wong, Susan E. Yost, Jin Sun Lee, John D. Gillece, Megan Folkerts, Lauren Reining, Sarah K. Highlander, Zahra Eftekhari, Joanne Mortimer, Yuan Yuan |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 14% |
United States | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 7 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 7 | 18% |
Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 8% |
Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
Professor | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 23 | 57% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 10% |
Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 3% |
Other | 5 | 13% |
Unknown | 24 | 60% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2021.
All research outputs
#3,449,485
of 25,643,886 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,090
of 22,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#88,451
of 454,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#66
of 1,000 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,643,886 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,095 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,000 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.