↓ Skip to main content

The Prognostic Value of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Their Receptors in Lung Adenocarcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Prognostic Value of Bone Morphogenetic Proteins and Their Receptors in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.608239
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wangyang Meng, Han Xiao, Rong Zhao, Dong Li, Kuo Li, Yunchong Meng, Jiaping Chen, Yangwei Wang, Yongde Liao

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2021.
All research outputs
#16,734,944
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,624
of 22,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#249,673
of 442,201 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#388
of 1,503 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,201 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,503 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.