↓ Skip to main content

High Moesin Expression Is a Predictor of Poor Prognosis of Breast Cancer: Evidence From a Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
High Moesin Expression Is a Predictor of Poor Prognosis of Breast Cancer: Evidence From a Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.650488
Pubmed ID
Authors

Xiaoli Hu, Yang Liu, Zhitong Bing, Qian Ye, Chengcheng Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 2 18%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 5 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 18%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 9%
Computer Science 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,534,321
of 26,289,377 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,613
of 22,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#158,756
of 529,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#130
of 1,361 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,289,377 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,963 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 529,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,361 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.