The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
FLVCR1 Predicts Poor Prognosis and Promotes Malignant Phenotype in Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma via Upregulating CSE1L
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.660955 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Suna Zhou, Mingxin Zhang, Chao Zhou, Yinnan Meng, Haihua Yang, Wenguang Ye |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 4 | 44% |
Other | 1 | 11% |
Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 22% |
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 11% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 11% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 11% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 11% |
Other | 0 | 0% |
Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2022.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,359
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#184,119
of 453,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#192
of 1,073 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,073 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.