↓ Skip to main content

Clinical Relevance of ABCB1, ABCG2, and ABCC2 Gene Polymorphisms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Nilotinib

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Clinical Relevance of ABCB1, ABCG2, and ABCC2 Gene Polymorphisms in Chronic Myeloid Leukemia Patients Treated With Nilotinib
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.672287
Pubmed ID
Authors

Federica Loscocco, Giuseppe Visani, Annamaria Ruzzo, Irene Bagaloni, Fabio Fuligni, Sara Galimberti, Antonello Di Paolo, Fabio Stagno, Patrizia Pregno, Mario Annunziata, Antonella Gozzini, Sara Barulli, Elisa Gabucci, Mauro Magnani, Alessandro Isidori

Timeline

Login to access the full chart related to this output.

If you don’t have an account, click here to discover Explorer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 13%
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Bachelor 2 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 7 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 26%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Unspecified 1 4%
Other 2 9%
Unknown 9 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2021.
All research outputs
#3,713,122
of 25,387,668 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,223
of 22,433 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,603
of 454,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#74
of 1,266 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,433 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,266 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.