You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Comparative Retrospective Study of Immunotherapy RANO Versus Standard RANO Criteria in Glioblastoma Patients Receiving Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Therapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.679331 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xin Chen, Mary Jane Lim-Fat, Lei Qin, Angie Li, Annie Bryant, Camden P. Bay, Lu Gao, Nityanand Miskin, Zaiyi Liu, J. Bryan Iorgulescu, Xiaoyin Xu, David A. Reardon, Geoffrey S. Young |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 40% |
| Scientists | 2 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 13 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 3 | 23% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 31% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 8% |
| Design | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 7 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#14,775,738
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#3,684
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#197,483
of 459,292 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#204
of 1,435 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 459,292 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,435 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.