↓ Skip to main content

Pan-Cancer Analysis of Glycolytic and Ketone Bodies Metabolic Genes: Implications for Response to Ketogenic Dietary Therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, October 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (91st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Pan-Cancer Analysis of Glycolytic and Ketone Bodies Metabolic Genes: Implications for Response to Ketogenic Dietary Therapy
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, October 2021
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2021.689068
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liyuan Qian, Yunzheng Li, Yajuan Cao, Gang Meng, Jin Peng, Huan Li, Ye Wang, Tiancheng Xu, Laizhu Zhang, Beicheng Sun, Binghua Li, Decai Yu

Abstract

The Warburg effect, also termed "aerobic glycolysis", is one of the most remarkable and ubiquitous metabolic characteristics exhibited by cancer cells, representing a potential vulnerability that might be targeted for tumor therapy. Ketogenic diets (KDs), composed of high-fat, moderate-protein and low carbohydrates, are aimed at targeting the Warburg effect for cancer treatment, which have recently gained considerable attention. However, the efficiency of KDs was inconsistent, and the genotypic contribution is still largely unknown. The bulk RNA-seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA), single cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq), and microarray data from Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and Cancer Cell Line Encyclopedia (CCLE) were collected. A joint analysis of glycolysis and ketone bodies metabolism (KBM) pathway was performed across over 10,000 tumor samples and nearly 1,000 cancer cell lines. A series of bioinformatic approaches were combined to identify a metabolic subtype that may predict the response to ketogenic dietary therapy (KDT). Mouse xenografts were established to validate the predictive utility of our subtypes in response to KDT. We first provided a system-level view of the expression pattern and prognosis of the signature genes from glycolysis and KBM pathway across 33 cancer types. Analysis by joint stratification of glycolysis and KBM revealed four metabolic subtypes, which correlated extensively but diversely with clinical outcomes across cancers. The glycolytic subtypes may be driven by TP53 mutations, whereas the KB-metabolic subtypes may be mediated by CTNNB1 (β-catenin) mutations. The glycolytic subtypes may have a better response to KDs compared to the other three subtypes. We preliminarily confirmed the idea by literature review and further performed a proof-of-concept experiment to validate the predictive value of the metabolic subtype in liver cancer xenografts. Our findings identified a metabolic subtype based on glycolysis and KBM that may serve as a promising biomarker to predict the clinical outcomes and therapeutic responses to KDT.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 14 58%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Unknown 16 67%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2024.
All research outputs
#7,199,921
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,387
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#132,672
of 441,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#128
of 1,469 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,469 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.