The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Intertumoural Heterogeneity and Branch Evolution of Synchronous Multiple Primary Lung Adenocarcinomas by Next-Generation Sequencing Analysis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.760715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Qinleng Zhang, Hui Jia, Zhendan Wang, Shaoyu Hao, Haiyan Huang, Airong Yang, Lu Han, Pingping Song |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2021.
All research outputs
#17,140,594
of 26,163,973 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,677
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,466
of 448,609 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#366
of 1,481 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,163,973 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,609 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,481 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.