The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Prognostic Value of CD9 in Solid Tumor: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, November 2021
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.764630 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Ping Zeng, Meng Si, Rui-xia Sun, Xu Cheng, Xiao-yang Li, Min-bin Chen |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 33% |
Student > Postgraduate | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 33% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2022.
All research outputs
#16,143,374
of 25,809,966 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,167
of 22,774 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#260,686
of 517,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#275
of 1,365 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,809,966 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,774 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 517,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,365 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.