The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Identification of a Hypoxia-Related Gene Model for Predicting the Prognosis and Formulating the Treatment Strategies in Kidney Renal Clear Cell Carcinoma
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2021.806264 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xiang-hui Ning, Ning-yang Li, Yuan-yuan Qi, Song-chao Li, Zhan-kui Jia, Jin-jian Yang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2022.
All research outputs
#21,307,042
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,636
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#402,359
of 531,556 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#693
of 1,431 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 531,556 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,431 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.