↓ Skip to main content

Deep learning for the detection of anatomical tissue structures and neoplasms of the skin on scanned histopathological tissue sections

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, November 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Deep learning for the detection of anatomical tissue structures and neoplasms of the skin on scanned histopathological tissue sections
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, November 2022
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.1022967
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katharina Kriegsmann, Frithjof Lobers, Christiane Zgorzelski, Jörg Kriegsmann, Charlotte Janßen, Rolf Rüdinger Meliß, Thomas Muley, Ulrich Sack, Georg Steinbuss, Mark Kriegsmann

Abstract

Basal cell carcinoma (BCC), squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and melanoma are among the most common cancer types. Correct diagnosis based on histological evaluation after biopsy or excision is paramount for adequate therapy stratification. Deep learning on histological slides has been suggested to complement and improve routine diagnostics, but publicly available curated and annotated data and usable models trained to distinguish common skin tumors are rare and often lack heterogeneous non-tumor categories. A total of 16 classes from 386 cases were manually annotated on scanned histological slides, 129,364 100 x 100 µm (~395 x 395 px) image tiles were extracted and split into a training, validation and test set. An EfficientV2 neuronal network was trained and optimized to classify image categories. Cross entropy loss, balanced accuracy and Matthews correlation coefficient were used for model evaluation. Image and patient data were assessed with confusion matrices. Application of the model to an external set of whole slides facilitated localization of melanoma and non-tumor tissue. Automated differentiation of BCC, SqCC, melanoma, naevi and non-tumor tissue structures was possible, and a high diagnostic accuracy was achieved in the validation (98%) and test (97%) set. In summary, we provide a curated dataset including the most common neoplasms of the skin and various anatomical compartments to enable researchers to train, validate and improve deep learning models. Automated classification of skin tumors by deep learning techniques is possible with high accuracy, facilitates tumor localization and has the potential to support and improve routine diagnostics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 69%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Computer Science 1 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 11 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2023.
All research outputs
#15,698,002
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,735
of 22,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#218,751
of 499,719 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#303
of 1,505 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 499,719 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,505 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.