The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Treatment of hepatic venous system hemorrhage and carbon dioxide gas embolization during laparoscopic hepatectomy via hepatic vein approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.1060823 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Zhen Qu, Ke-Jia Wu, Jia-Wei Feng, Ding-Sen Shi, Yu-Xiang Chen, Dong-Lin Sun, Yun-Fei Duan, Jing Chen, Xiao-Zhou He |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 January 2023.
All research outputs
#20,591,909
of 26,180,771 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,615
of 22,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#342,523
of 486,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#737
of 1,459 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,771 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 486,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,459 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.