The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Associations of Racial and Ethnic Category, Age, Comorbidities, and Socioeconomic Factors on Concordance to NCCN Guidelines for Patients With High-Risk Biliary Tract Cancers After Surgery
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.771688 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Lauren F. Huang, Augustine Hong, Gino Cioffi, Asrar Alahmadi, Tin-Yun Tang, Lee M. Ocuin, Nirav Patil, David L. Bajor, Joel N. Saltzman, Amr Mohamed, Eva Selfridge, Monica Webb Hooper, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan, Richard T. Lee |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 50% |
Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 1 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 13% |
Other | 1 | 13% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 13% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Social Sciences | 1 | 13% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 4 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2022.
All research outputs
#4,763,735
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,642
of 22,436 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#106,798
of 451,346 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#109
of 1,569 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,436 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,346 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,569 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.