You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Critical Role of Flow Cytometric Immunophenotyping in the Diagnosis, Subtyping, and Staging of T-Cell/NK-Cell Non-Hodgkin’s Lymphoma in Real-World Practice: A Study of 232 Cases From a Tertiary Cancer Center in India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.779230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Prashant R. Tembhare, Gaurav Chatterjee, Anumeha Chaturvedi, Niharika Dasgupta, Twinkle Khanka, Shefali Verma, Sitaram G. Ghogale, Nilesh Deshpande, Karishma Girase, Manju Sengar, Bhausaheb Bagal, Hasmukh Jain, Dhanalaxmi Shetty, Sweta Rajpal, Nikhil Patkar, Tushar Agrawal, Sridhar Epari, Tanuja Shet, Papagudi G. Subramanian, Sumeet Gujral |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 127 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 9% |
| India | 7 | 6% |
| Mexico | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
| France | 2 | 2% |
| Russia | 1 | <1% |
| Palestine, State of | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 88 | 69% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 93 | 73% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 18 | 14% |
| Scientists | 16 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 17 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 4 | 24% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 24% |
| Researcher | 2 | 12% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 18% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 12% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 12% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 83. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2024.
All research outputs
#541,316
of 26,210,036 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#87
of 22,937 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,514
of 455,877 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#6
of 1,544 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,210,036 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,937 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,877 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,544 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.