You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Physicians’ Perceptions of Clinical Utility of a Digital Health Tool for Electronic Patient-Reported Outcome Monitoring in Real-Life Hematology Practice. Evidence From the GIMEMA-ALLIANCE Platform
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.826040 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Fabio Efficace, Andrea Patriarca, Mario Luppi, Leonardo Potenza, Giovanni Caocci, Agostino Tafuri, Francesca Fazio, Claudio Cartoni, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Ida Carmosino, Riccardo Moia, Gloria Margiotta Casaluci, Paola Boggione, Elisabetta Colaci, Davide Giusti, Valeria Pioli, Francesco Sparano, Francesco Cottone, Paolo De Fabritiis, Nicolina Rita Ardu, Pasquale Niscola, Isabella Capodanno, Anna Paola Leporace, Sabrina Pelliccia, Elisabetta Lugli, Edoardo La Sala, Luigi Rigacci, Michelina Santopietro, Claudio Fozza, Sergio Siragusa, Massimo Breccia, Paola Fazi, Marco Vignetti |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Austria | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 20 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 5% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 30% |
| Psychology | 2 | 10% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 11 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 August 2022.
All research outputs
#7,425,961
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,541
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,553
of 468,395 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#177
of 1,539 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 468,395 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,539 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.