The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluating Proton Dose and Associated Range Uncertainty Using Daily Cone-Beam CT
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, April 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.830981 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Heng Li, William T Hrinivich, Hao Chen, Khadija Sheikh, Meng Wei Ho, Rachel Ger, Dezhi Liu, Russell Kenneth Hales, Khinh Ranh Voong, Aditya Halthore, Curtiland Deville |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 2 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 5 | 42% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 2 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 8% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 6 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 May 2022.
All research outputs
#16,275,661
of 26,166,431 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,183
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,004
of 453,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#333
of 1,537 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,166,431 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,537 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.