The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Influence of Deep Invasive Tumor Thrombus on the Surgical Complexity and Prognosis of Patients With Non-Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Combined With Venous Tumor Thrombus
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, February 2022
|
DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.833780 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Xun Zhao, Ye Yan, Jing-Han Dong, Zhuo Liu, Hong-Xian Zhang, Cheng Liu, Lu-Lin Ma |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2022.
All research outputs
#5,025,700
of 26,432,239 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#1,765
of 23,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,430
of 539,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#112
of 1,458 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,432,239 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,146 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 539,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,458 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.