The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Effects of Different Induction Chemotherapy Cycles and Adjuvant Chemotherapy on the Survival Outcomes of Patients With Locally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, June 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.845704 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shu Liao, Yunlian Diao, Qingyuan Ling, Zhijuan Xiong, Wenxin Deng, Ping Zhang, Congkai Zhang, Ying Ying, Xiaojun Zhong, Wei Zhang |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#17,457,301
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,992
of 23,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,778
of 449,603 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#459
of 1,727 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,603 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,727 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.