↓ Skip to main content

The Prognostic Value of Pretherapy Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Indices in Myelodysplastic Syndromes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The Prognostic Value of Pretherapy Peripheral Blood Inflammatory Indices in Myelodysplastic Syndromes
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2022
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.877981
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cong Shi, Shengping Gong, Tingting Niu, Tongyu Li, An Wu, Xiaojiao Zheng, Shujun Yang, Guifang Ouyang, Qitian Mu

Abstract

Inflammation appears to have a critical role in carcinogenesis tumor growth according to emerging research. The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and plasma C-reactive protein (CRP) are considered to reflect the systemic inflammatory response and clinical prognosis. The prognostic value of inflammatory indices in myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients remains unclear. A total of 213 MDS patients were enrolled for the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine the prognostic significance of various indicators, including PLR, NLR, and CRP. MDS patients with higher PLR, NLR, and CRP levels had significantly shorter overall survival (OS). Based on univariate analysis, age (≥60 years), gender (men), lower hemoglobin level (<10 g/dl), higher bone marrow blast percentage (>5%), poorer karyotype, and higher Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) score were significantly associated with shorter OS. Patients with higher CRP levels had shorter leukemia-free survival (LFS, P = 0.041). However, higher PLR and NLR had no significant influence on LFS (P > 0.05). Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that high PLR and CRP were also independent adverse prognostic factors for OS in MDS. Elevated PLR and CRP predict poor prognosis independent of the IPSS-R and provide a novel evaluation factor for MDS patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 25%
Unknown 2 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 May 2022.
All research outputs
#17,287,336
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,850
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#255,408
of 451,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#420
of 1,549 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,275 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,549 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.