↓ Skip to main content

Survival Risk Scores for Real-Life Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Elotuzumab or Carfilzomib In Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as Salvage Therapy: Analysis of…

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, July 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survival Risk Scores for Real-Life Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients Receiving Elotuzumab or Carfilzomib In Combination With Lenalidomide and Dexamethasone as Salvage Therapy: Analysis of 919 Cases Outside Clinical Trials
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, July 2022
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.890376
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fortunato Morabito, Elena Zamagni, Concetta Conticello, Vincenzo Pavone, Salvatore Palmieri, Sara Bringhen, Monica Galli, Silvia Mangiacavalli, Daniele Derudas, Elena Rossi, Roberto Ria, Lucio Catalano, Paola Tacchetti, Giuseppe Mele, Iolanda Donatella Vincelli, Enrica Antonia Martino, Ernesto Vigna, Antonella Bruzzese, Francesco Mendicino, Cirino Botta, Anna Mele, Lucia Pantani, Serena Rocchi, Bruno Garibaldi, Nicola Cascavilla, Stelvio Ballanti, Giovanni Tripepi, Ferdinando Frigeri, Antonetta Pia Falcone, Clotilde Cangialosi, Giovanni Reddiconto, Giuliana Farina, Marialucia Barone, Ilaria Rizzello, Enrico Iaccino, Selena Mimmi, Paola Curci, Barbara Gamberi, Pellegrino Musto, Valerio De Stefano, Maurizio Musso, Maria Teresa Petrucci, Massimo Offidani, Francesco Di Raimondo, Mario Boccadoro, Michele Cavo, Antonino Neri, Massimo Gentile

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Arts and Humanities 1 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 14%
Unknown 5 71%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 August 2022.
All research outputs
#17,288,068
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,850
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#242,866
of 439,183 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#502
of 1,748 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,183 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,748 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.