↓ Skip to main content

Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
16 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
161 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Photobiomodulation therapy in management of cancer therapy-induced side effects: WALT position paper 2022
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2022
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2022.927685
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jolien Robijns, Raj G. Nair, Joy Lodewijckx, Praveen Arany, Andrei Barasch, Jan M. Bjordal, Paolo Bossi, Anne Chilles, Patricia M. Corby, Joel B. Epstein, Sharon Elad, Reza Fekrazad, Eduardo Rodrigues Fregnani, Marie-Thérèse Genot, Ana M. C. Ibarra, Michael R. Hamblin, Vladimir Heiskanen, Ken Hu, Jean Klastersky, Rajesh Lalla, Sofia Latifian, Arun Maiya, Jeroen Mebis, Cesar A. Migliorati, Dan M. J. Milstein, Barbara Murphy, Judith E. Raber-Durlacher, Hendrik J. Roseboom, Stephen Sonis, Nathaniel Treister, Yehuda Zadik, René-Jean Bensadoun, “Cancer Supportive Care” WALT Working Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 16 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 161 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 12 7%
Researcher 11 7%
Student > Master 10 6%
Unspecified 9 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 5%
Other 29 18%
Unknown 82 51%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 39 24%
Unspecified 10 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Other 9 6%
Unknown 87 54%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#1,948,919
of 26,391,552 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#411
of 23,083 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,992
of 436,371 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#22
of 1,773 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,391,552 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,083 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 436,371 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,773 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.