The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Interpretable clinical visualization model for prediction of prognosis in osteosarcoma: a large cohort data study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, August 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.945362 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Wenle Li, Genyang Jin, Huitao Wu, Rilige Wu, Chan Xu, Bing Wang, Qiang Liu, Zhaohui Hu, Haosheng Wang, Shengtao Dong, Zhi-Ri Tang, Haiwen Peng, Wei Zhao, Chengliang Yin |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 50% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 August 2022.
All research outputs
#21,310,332
of 26,169,168 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,651
of 22,913 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,291
of 437,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#952
of 1,819 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,169,168 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,913 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,819 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.