The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evaluation of tracer kinetic parameters in cervical cancer using dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI as biomarkers in terms of biological relevance, diagnostic performance and inter-center variability
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, October 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.958219 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xue Wang, Shujian Li, Xianhui Lin, Yi Lu, Chuanwan Mao, Zhijun Ye, Xuesheng Li, Tong-San Koh, Jie Liu, Jingjing Liu, Xiaoyue Ma, Jingliang Cheng, Gang Ning, Zhihan Yan, Zujun Hou |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2022.
All research outputs
#21,440,282
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,820
of 22,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#331,007
of 447,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#1,017
of 1,765 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,663 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,765 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.