You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Case report: Common clonal origin of concurrent langerhans cell histiocytosis and acute myeloid leukemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, September 2022
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2022.974307 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shintaro Kazama, Kazuaki Yokoyama, Toshimitsu Ueki, Hiroko Kazumoto, Hidetoshi Satomi, Masahiko Sumi, Ichiro Ito, Nozomi Yusa, Rika Kasajima, Eigo Shimizu, Rui Yamaguchi, Seiya Imoto, Satoru Miyano, Yukihisa Tanaka, Tamami Denda, Yasunori Ota, Arinobu Tojo, Hikaru Kobayashi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 2 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#17,294,011
of 26,179,695 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#6,854
of 22,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#233,809
of 425,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#582
of 1,803 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,179,695 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 425,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,803 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.