The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
What if: A retrospective reconstruction of resection cavity stereotactic radiosurgery to mimic neoadjuvant stereotactic radiosurgery
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, March 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1056330 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gueliz Acker, Marcel Nachbar, Nina Soffried, Bohdan Bodnar, Anastasia Janas, Kiril Krantchev, Goda Kalinauskaite, Anne Kluge, David Shultz, Alfredo Conti, David Kaul, Daniel Zips, Peter Vajkoczy, Carolin Senger |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2023.
All research outputs
#23,513,156
of 26,178,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#16,431
of 22,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#373,661
of 434,450 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#972
of 1,353 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,178,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,450 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,353 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.