↓ Skip to main content

Primary spinal anaplastic ependymoma: A single-institute retrospective cohort and systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, February 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Primary spinal anaplastic ependymoma: A single-institute retrospective cohort and systematic review
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, February 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1083085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Liang Wu, Li’ao Wang, Wanjing Zou, Jun Yang, Wenqing Jia, Yulun Xu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 February 2023.
All research outputs
#21,381,945
of 26,246,850 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,793
of 22,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#363,491
of 488,180 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#742
of 1,401 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,246,850 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 488,180 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,401 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.