↓ Skip to main content

Preoperative levels of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in different subtypes of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: Predictive value for determining extent of surgical resection

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, April 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (55th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Preoperative levels of folate receptor-positive circulating tumor cells in different subtypes of early-stage lung adenocarcinoma: Predictive value for determining extent of surgical resection
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, April 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1119807
Pubmed ID
Authors

Chao Zhou, Ran Zhao, Ruiying Zhao, Ansheng Wang, Wentao Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2023.
All research outputs
#20,597,484
of 26,171,302 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,620
of 22,919 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#301,058
of 422,203 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#444
of 1,221 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,171,302 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,919 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 422,203 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,221 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.