↓ Skip to main content

Identification and validation of m6A-GPI signatures as a novel prognostic model for colorectal cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, June 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Identification and validation of m6A-GPI signatures as a novel prognostic model for colorectal cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, June 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1145753
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bin Ma, Simeng Bao, Yongmin Li

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,381,945
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,785
of 22,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#286,682
of 387,458 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#391
of 1,052 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,458 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,052 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.