The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Invasion of the bucco-mandibular space by oral squamous cell carcinoma: histopathological analysis of invasion pattern
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1168376 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Takuma Kugimoto, Naoto Nishii, Yu Oikawa, Takeshi Kuroshima, Hideaki Hirai, Hirofumi Tomioka, Yasuyuki Michi, Kou Kayamori, Junichiro Sakamoto, Joe Iwanaga, R. Shane Tubbs, Tohru Ikeda, Masahiko Miura, Hiroyuki Harada |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 October 2023.
All research outputs
#16,608,224
of 26,180,352 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#5,857
of 22,922 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#176,263
of 365,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#136
of 938 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,180,352 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,922 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,697 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 938 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.