↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy performed by the same surgical team during the same period

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, July 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of short-term outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic distal gastrectomy performed by the same surgical team during the same period
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, July 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1174396
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jiliang Shen, Xu Feng, Zheyong Li, Yong Wang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 July 2023.
All research outputs
#21,461,250
of 26,337,162 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,844
of 22,975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#279,083
of 377,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#390
of 1,053 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,337,162 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,975 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,053 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.