The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Body composition as a predictor of oncological outcome in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer receiving intravesical instillation after transurethral resection of bladder tumor
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, August 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1180888 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Liang-Kang Huang, Yu-Ching Lin, Hai-Hua Chuang, Cheng-Keng Chuang, See-Tong Pang, Chun-Te Wu, Ying-Hsu Chang, Kai-Jie Yu, Po-Hung Lin, Hung-Cheng Kan, Yuan-Cheng Chu, Wei-Kang Hung, Ming-Li Hsieh, I-Hung Shao |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#18,142,667
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#8,421
of 23,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,999
of 368,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#248
of 1,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.