↓ Skip to main content

Comparison between two cancer registry quality check systems: functional features and differences in an Italian network of cancer registries dataset

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison between two cancer registry quality check systems: functional features and differences in an Italian network of cancer registries dataset
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, May 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1197942
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giovanna Tagliabue, Viviana Perotti, Sabrina Fabiano, Andrea Tittarelli, Giulio Barigelletti, Paolo Contiero, Walter Mazzucco, Mario Fusco, Ettore Bidoli, Massimo Vicentini, Maria Teresa Pesce, Fabrizio Stracci, The Collaborative Working Group

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 29%
Student > Bachelor 1 14%
Researcher 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 29%
Computer Science 1 14%
Unknown 4 57%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 June 2023.
All research outputs
#21,442,743
of 26,314,361 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#11,822
of 22,971 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#297,950
of 399,862 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#447
of 1,131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,314,361 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,971 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 399,862 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.