The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Adverse events of immune checkpoint therapy alone versus when combined with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors: a pooled meta-analysis of 1735 patients
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in oncology, January 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fonc.2023.1238517 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Iuliia Kovalenko, Wern Lynn Ng, Yimin Geng, Yinghong Wang, Pavlos Msaouel, Shailender Bhatia, Petros Grivas, Raed Benkhadra, Omar Alhalabi |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 9 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 30% |
| Scientists | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2024.
All research outputs
#6,874,479
of 26,296,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#2,318
of 22,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,738
of 377,501 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#46
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,296,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,967 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 377,501 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.