↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Implementation of genomic and epigenomic innovation in clinical cancer diagnostics

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, August 2023
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Implementation of genomic and epigenomic innovation in clinical cancer diagnostics
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, August 2023
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1253630
Pubmed ID
Authors

Laila C. Schenkel, Anahita Mohseni Meybodi, Shamini Selvarajah

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2023.
All research outputs
#15,360,174
of 26,538,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#4,118
of 23,242 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#150,761
of 368,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#99
of 1,012 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,538,386 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 23,242 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,478 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1,012 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.