↓ Skip to main content

A meta-analysis of the clinicopathological significance of the lncRNA MALAT1 in human gastric cancer

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in oncology, January 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (51st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A meta-analysis of the clinicopathological significance of the lncRNA MALAT1 in human gastric cancer
Published in
Frontiers in oncology, January 2024
DOI 10.3389/fonc.2023.1257120
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shaoxiong Bai, Jiansheng Guo, Haofan Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 January 2024.
All research outputs
#20,655,067
of 26,245,314 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in oncology
#9,678
of 22,949 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,194
of 376,093 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in oncology
#238
of 784 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,245,314 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 22,949 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 376,093 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 784 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.